JCRED Symposium: Closing the Justice Gap: A Civil Right to Counsel

While the United States recognizes a defendant’s right to counsel in criminal cases, it doesn’t extend that right to cases involving housing, child custody, immigration, and other civil matters. The lack of a civil right to counsel creates and exacerbates injustices for individuals who can’t afford, or otherwise access, legal representation. This virtual symposium—and the Journal’s related symposium issue—will bring together a panel of leading scholars and practitioners who will examine this justice gap and consider approaches to improving access to civil counsel.

Date
Monday, October 17, 2022

Time
6:30 p.m.

Location

The symposium will livestream on WebEx.

Panelists
Jennifer Prusak, Associate Clinical Professor of Law; Director, Housing Law Clinic, Vanderbilt University Law School

Douglas Smith, Lecturer in Legal Studies, Brandeis University

Maria Roumiantseva, Esq., Associate Coordinator, Public Justice Center’s National Coalition for a Civil Right to Counsel

Register to Attend
Please register online to attend the symposium. After you register, we’ll email you the Zoom access instructions.

Questions?
Contact Katherin Valdez-Lazo at Katherin.valdez16@stjohns.edu to learn more about the symposium.

See you there!

Call for Papers on Liberty and Justice for All?: Examining Shortcomings in the Rights of the Incarcerated

Liberty And Justice For All?: Examining Shortcomings In The Rights Of The Incarcerated 

The Journal of Civil Rights and Economic Development (JCRED) is pleased to announce a Call for Papers for our upcoming Spring Symposium Issue. In addition to publication, the Journal will select three authors to participate in the JCRED Symposium Panel, hosted by St. John’s University School of Law. The symposium will bring together scholars, advocates, and policymakers to discuss current constitutional law topics concerning incarceration, prison conditions, and the rights of those incarcerated. 

Incarcerated individuals in America are facing a human rights crisis. In the United States, there are approximately two million people incarcerated. [1] Jails and prisons have not adequately provided treatment, education, or rehabilitation to those incarcerated, but have subjected those inside to high levels of violence while neglecting their basic human needs. These issues have been highlighted by recent movements and protests, particularly those formed by prisoners inside correctional facilities such as Rikers Island. In 2021 alone, 15 inmates died in custody at Rikers Island, which has highlighted the inhumane conditions individuals are forced to live in and the lack of adequate medical access available to those at Rikers. [2] The COVID-19 pandemic also emphasized how prisons lack appropriate personal protective equipment and adequate testing methods, as evidenced by cluster outbreaks. [3] In addition to facing human rights violations, individuals who are incarcerated routinely face violations of their Constitutional rights, such as their Eighth Amendment right to be free from cruel and unusual punishment, and their First Amendment right to exercise their religion.[4] 

The growing calls for reform make this an ideal time to explore this issue and possible solutions further. Some possible topics and themes for interested scholars to consider writing on include but are not limited to:

  • Analyses of current protections implemented by State and Federal governments to protect the rights of those in prison

  • Arguments in favor of or in opposition to the abolition of the prison industrial complex

  • Comparisons regarding the frequency of violated rights or disparate treatment of imprisoned individuals who belong to certain protected classes, or who face more frequent rights violations because of their race, religion, sexual orientation, or other status

  • Analyses of First Amendment violations of those who are imprisoned

  • Implications of the Eighth Amendment

  • Explorations into lawsuits regarding human rights violations within jails and prisons and how courts view such issues

  • Analysis on the effectiveness of prisons and jail in rehabilitating individuals and deterring future crimes

  • Analyses of the long-term effects on formerly incarcerated individuals who have had their rights violated while incarcerated

  • Arguments in favor or opposition of closing Rikers Island

  • Capital Punishment

  • The effect of sentencing guidelines

  • The effect of the COVID-19 Pandemic within Prisons

INSTRUCTIONS FOR SUBMISSIONS 

The Journal of Civil Rights and Economic Development seeks to elevate underrepresented voices in legal academia — academics and non-academics at all levels are encouraged to apply. We welcome full-length traditional law review articles up to 75 pages, as well as shorter essays of 10 or more pages, commentaries, and practice guides. We aim to ensure an array of perspectives and expertise. Thus, interdisciplinary approaches are welcome. 

In addition to publication, the Journal will select 3 authors to participate in the JCRED Symposium Panel, which will take place in the Spring of 2023, in coordination with the availability of the authors. The selected authors will also each receive a $500 honorarium for their contribution.

Submission Deadlines: 

  • Abstract Deadline: September 12th, 2022 

  • Notification Date for Selected Authors: September 23, 2022 

  • First Draft Deadline: October 17, 2022 

  • Final Article Submission Deadline: January 6th, 2023 

To Submit, Please Send the following materials for consideration to  jcredstjohns@gmail.com or via this form: 

  • Abstract with a minimum length of two pages; 

  • Your name, title, and professional affiliation; 

  • Your Curriculum Vitae/Resume; 

  • Your contact details including phone number and email address.

Optional: Full Manuscripts are also welcome 

  • Manuscripts between 25 and 75 pages for full-length articles and essays, commentaries, or practice guides between 10 and 20 pages. 

Please submit your abstract (or manuscript/essay/commentary) for consideration to: jcredstjohns@gmail.com, or via this form. 

If you have any questions about this call for papers, please contact the Research & Symposium Director, Katherin Valdez-Lazo, Katherin.valdezlazo.jcred@gmail.com, or the Editor-in-Chief, Abigail Sloan, Abigail.sloan.jcred@gmail.com.

JCRED Honors Its 2021 Best Notes Awards Winners

Members of JCRED came together to celebrate Kathryn O’Brien and Meagan Shantz.

The Journal of Civil Rights and Economic Development honored Research and Symposium Director Kathryn O’Brien, Best Notes Award winner, and Executive Notes and Comments Editor Meagan Schantz, runner-up in a ceremony on October 20.

Kathryn O’Brien was named JCRED’s 2021 Best Notes Award Winner.

O’Brien’s Note, "Camera-Enforced Streets: Creating an Anti-Racist System of Traffic Enforcement," examines how modern traffic enforcement creates severe economic burdens for Black drivers and advocates for removing traffic enforcement from police control in favor of an automated system.

Meagan Schantz’s Note, “Technology’s War on Terror: The Need for Platform Accountability in the Wake of a National Crisis,” examines the scope of liability for social media platforms in monitoring terrorist content, through the lens of Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act and the Anti-Terrorism Act.

JCRED Announces Its 2021 Best Notes Award Winners

Kathryn O’Brien wins first place and Meagan Schantz wins runner-up.

The Journal of Civil Rights and Economic Development has announced Research and Symposium Director Kathryn O’Brien as its 2021 Best Notes winner and Executive Notes and Comments Editor Meagan Schantz as its runner-up.

Kathryn O’Brien’s Note, "Camera-Enforced Streets: Creating an Anti-Racist System of Traffic Enforcement," examines how modern traffic enforcement creates severe economic burdens for Black drivers and advocates for removing traffic enforcement from police control in favor of an automated system.

Meagan Schantz’s Note, “Technology’s War on Terror: The Need for Platform Accountability in the Wake of a National Crisis,” examines the scope of liability for social media platforms in monitoring terrorist content, through the lens of Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act and the Anti-Terrorism Act.

JCRED applauds both authors for their exceptional work.